Unusual trading patterns in the oil and stock markets have triggered concerns regarding potential insider trading ahead of President Trump’s recent remarks on Iran. Following missile strikes on U.S. military bases in Iraq, market volatility was expected; however, significant spikes in stock futures and a sudden drop in oil prices occurred minutes before the official televised announcement. Analysts suggest these pre-speech shifts indicate that some traders may have possessed advance knowledge of the administration’s decision to de-escalate rather than pursue immediate military action.
- Oil prices began to decline and stock futures rose significantly shortly before the public address regarding the conflict with Iran.
- Market analysts observed high-volume trading activity in S&P 500 futures approximately 15 to 20 minutes prior to the official announcement.
- The televised address confirmed that the U.S. would not seek an immediate military response, a move that calmed global markets.
- The timing of these market movements has led to suspicions of potential information leaks or insider trading within financial circles.
- Observers noted that the price corrections started while the public was still anticipating a potential escalation of hostilities.
France 24 is an international television network and news website owned by the French state.
Official website: https://www.france24.com/en/
Original video here.
This summary has been generated by AI.
Either insider trading or time traveler.
Byron Trump is innocent 😂
Trump thinks we’re all suckers. I’m sure he’s involved in this.
The real question is who made $580 million into oil shorts and $1.5 billion into stock futures just 15 minutes before the President's announcement?
Hmm which to believe… the US President who backed off on a threat that suddenly had a mysterious $580 million insider stock echange triggered, or Iran who's just been bombing away consistently like they've been doing since this all started.. Gee whizzzzz……
Drill Baby Drill
If insider trades are based on information the markets don't share, then "inside" becomes "the entity" or "entities" which made the futures trade. That semantic fact has broad implications for both the corporate capacity for action and the substantial nature of understanding this situation.
15 minutes before Trump ordered the postponement the massive trade in oil futures, knowledge (1) that the decision to postone the threat of Saturday evening would cause (2) West Texas Crude Oil to drop 40%. Shall we call that market "current"? Since Monday morning we learn the coincidence between the size of that trade and its profit for future contracts in oil–at that time, but where?
The breach of duty implied in 1934 shows how definite "information" becomes in a legal context. Now if "materiality" or "non-public" are two terms essential for finding the duty breached, then the markets' ignorance of the trade itself becomes a second basis for "information" without combining the entity with the agency of this ambiguous event (predicated on Saturday night, not 15 minutes in the future). So "the law" in this "legal context" turns from liability or profit socially into offer or acceptance in fact; directing =any "trade" in that context toward some final, not the efficient result. The persons acting and some representative executing the trade may also need official or corporate status subject to the duty. Those persons (i, you, he) are not the number (singular, plural) for that syntax. Stop.
West Texas crude dropped from lower demand anticipated from greater supply, unlike an inventory for a market, as a consequence of the postponement, not the "action" that was unanticipated within that market. How can trading be inside and so within at once? The answer may lie in the nature of the entity making the trade rather than the persons executing the trade. Consider how hot a wire transfer arrives at a bank before it gets converted into cash for the client. Find the information before you contact the client on the other end of that wire.
The stock market is NOT the economy! It’s a casino for the wealthy! An overwhelming number of Americans don’t own stocsk. The rest are forced to own stocks in thier company’s retirement scheme! Called a 401k. Essentially, a majority of Americans don’t give a rat’s ding ding a it the stock market. We have nothing to do with it! Just don’t care!
Trump is doing WAR Trading. It was always about money.
Another example of West with no values.
Oh suspicions is it? I suspected the sun rose from the east this morning
investigation is needed….this is national security issue!
😂😂 sure an ive got a bridge for SALE
Oh yeah its all about the money , doesn't matter how many people die even children, trump and his family and friends are getting very rich
Trump will go to his grave laughing about having scammed all americans without anyone ever stopping him for any of his crimes.
Trillion Petro-Dollar Question: Who made that trade, and for whom?
First, who are those traders? Do they have ties with anyone that could know what was going to happen? How many chances are that you sell right at the time when something happens? Cmon, we can clearly see what is going on here. Proofs are in the transactions; if anyone remotely involved with the current US administration made bets or got money from trades they didn't do directly, clearly those are most likely to be in the know of what was about to happen.
Far East TV stations and think tanks have been reporting widely on this.
Why are you so late??
Imagine that..a dishonest administration?
Nahhh couldn't be true..tricky trump is as honest as ol Abe Lincoln 😂
should the stock markets be shut down due to illegal activity?😮
the united states government should pick up someone who knows what they're doing.
Make the trading record public 😂